Honda CR-V 2015 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 105 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 63 litres | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Outlander version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.10 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 30 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1754 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |