Honda CR-V 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 16 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 94 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 16 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |