Honda CR-V 2013 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 43 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 170 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Opel Antara has
| |