Honda CR-V 2013 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 105 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.8 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 986 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 444 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 683 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |