Honda CR-V 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 162 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6 seconds | |
Honda CR-V engine produces 68 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.7 | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.54 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.58 m | |
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 387 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 138 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |