Honda CR-V 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 68 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.7 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 387 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
952 litres | 1525 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 138 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 573 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`505 kg | 1`455 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 405 kg | 545 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |