Honda CR-V 2002 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 2 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.8 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
| Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1705 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 753 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |