Honda CR-V 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 135 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. Nissan X-Trail 2017: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |