Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 66 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 875 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1110 litres | 1688 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 578 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |