Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 194 HP | |
Torque: | 245 NM | 258 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.1 | |
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 506 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1620 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 510 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`135 | |
Safety: | |||
The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 19 000 | 23 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |