Honda CR-V 2017 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 14 HP more power than Audi Q3, but torque is 35 NM less than Audi Q3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.7 | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 20 cm longer than the Audi Q3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 37 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi Q3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |