Honda CR-V 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 6 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda CR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from nine 4x4 versions of Honda CR-V 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 21 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 24 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`213 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |