Honda CR-V 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 135 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |