Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 44 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 875 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1110 litres | 1687 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 378 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 577 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`115 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |