Honda CR-V 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 41 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. Toyota RAV4 2019: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by transferring up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 83 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |