Honda CR-V 2017 vs Jeep Cherokee 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 80 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 157 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 448 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1110 litres | 1555 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 445 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |