Honda CR-V 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 19 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 67 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 475 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Qashqai, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |