Honda CR-V 2017 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 963 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 466 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |