Honda CR-V 2017 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 22 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 181 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 539 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1860 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 42 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |