Honda CR-V 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 44 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2015 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |