Honda CR-V 2015 vs Subaru Forester 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 8 NM less than Subaru Forester. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.2 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Used also on Subaru XV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1669 litres | 1557 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 84 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.1 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`015 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`543 kg | 1`570 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 557 kg | 445 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |