Honda CR-V 2015 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 17 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.8 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly communicates with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and the electric power steering to maintain full control of the vehicle, good traction and maneuverability in any road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Malibu | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Honda CR-V and Opel Antara are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1391 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 187 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`183 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Opel Antara has
| |