Honda CR-V 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 18 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 86 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |