Honda CR-V 2015 vs Kia Sportage 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V and Kia Sportage have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 2 NM less than Kia Sportage. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Sportage engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 13 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 466 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 123 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.1 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |