Honda CR-V 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 10 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 92 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |