Honda CR-V 2022 vs Volvo XC60 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda CR-V is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Volvo XC60 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 190 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 - 243 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.4 seconds | 5.3 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.8 - 7.1 | 2.0 - 7.7 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 153 - 208 mm (6 - 8.2 inches) | 216 - 400 mm (8.5 - 15.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2166 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 608 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 734 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`325 kg | ~ 2`507 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`759 kg | ~ 2`007 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 566 kg | ~ 500 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |