Honda CR-V 2022 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 190 HP | 133 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 - 243 NM | 195 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.8 - 7.1 | 5.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 153 - 208 mm (6 - 8.2 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | 331 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2166 litres | 2217 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 782 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`325 | ~ 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |