Honda CR-V 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Honda CR-V is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 - 190 HP | 155 - 194 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 243 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.6 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.1 | 5.8 - 7.2 | |
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 190 - 208 mm (7.5 - 8.2 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 940 litres | 506 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1945 litres | 1620 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 434 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 325 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`258 | ~ 2`085 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 26 000 | 24 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |