Honda CR-V 2019 vs BMW X3 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X3 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. BMW X3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 190 HP | 184 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 243 NM | 300 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.6 seconds | 4.9 - 8.4 seconds | |
| In general, BMW X3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.1 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 208 mm (7.5 - 8.2 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 940 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1945 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 345 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`258 kg | ~ 2`511 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`633 kg | ~ 1`899 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 625 kg | ~ 612 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 44 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
BMW X3 has
| |