Honda CR-V 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 190 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1110 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2146 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 615 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 691 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`208 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |