Honda CR-V 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.4 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 190 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 4.5 - 5.3 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 21 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1110 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2146 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 589 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`208 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |