Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 190 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 5.5 - 9.4 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | 190 - 193 mm (7.5 - 7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 875 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1110 litres | 1688 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 578 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`208 kg | ~ 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`618 kg | ~ 1`567 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 590 kg | ~ 523 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |