Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 190 HP | 155 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 5.8 - 7.2 | |
|
On average, the Honda CR-V petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda CX-5. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1110 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2146 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 604 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 526 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`208 | ~ 2`085 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |