Honda CR-V 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 188 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 350 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.8 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.9 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
On average, the Honda CR-V petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan X-Trail. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 12 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1982 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 39 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 313 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`100 | ~ 2`195 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 14 400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |