Honda CR-V 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V 2010 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V 2012 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 185 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V 2010. On average, Honda CR-V 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | 170 - 185 mm (6.7 - 7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2012 is 1 cm longer than the Honda CR-V 2010, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1053 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2008 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012 has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V 2012 has 529 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2010. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V 2012 (by 476 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`133 kg | ~ 2`113 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`573 kg | ~ 1`684 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 560 kg | ~ 429 kg | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Honda CR-V 2010. Therefore, Honda CR-V 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |