Honda CR-V 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 185 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, the Honda CR-V petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan X-Trail. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1053 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2008 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 26 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`133 kg | ~ 2`195 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`573 kg | ~ 1`571 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 560 kg | ~ 624 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |