Honda CR-V 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 185 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 1.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, a Honda CR-V with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1053 litres | 771 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2008 litres | 1792 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`133 kg | ~ 2`159 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`573 kg | ~ 1`573 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 560 kg | ~ 586 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |