Honda CR-V 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 190 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 350 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.4 | 1.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, a Honda CR-V with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 771 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1792 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 182 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 123 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`133 | ~ 2`159 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |