Honda CR-V 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 198 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | 9.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 - 185 mm (6.7 - 7.3 inches) | 182 - 191 mm (7.2 - 7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 15 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`113 kg | ~ 2`137 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`611 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 526 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Toyota RAV4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |