Honda CR-V 2010 vs Subaru Forester 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 147 - 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 9.5 | 6.3 - 10.5 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 74 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`097 | ~ 2`027 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |