Honda CR-V 2010 vs Subaru Forester 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 147 - 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Forester are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 6.3 - 10.5 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Forester may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`113 kg | ~ 2`027 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`503 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 524 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |