Honda CR-V 2010 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-7 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.2 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 163 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 205 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-7 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 7.5 - 11.5 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-7. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda CR-V is 14 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 758 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`113 kg | ~ 2`273 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`801 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 472 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |