Honda CR-V 2010 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-7 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-7 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.2 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 163 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 205 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | 8.2 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 9.5 | 7.5 - 11.5 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-7. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda CR-V is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 69 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`097 | ~ 2`273 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |