Honda CR-V 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2010 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V 2006 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V 2006 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, the Honda CR-V 2010 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda CR-V 2006. On average, Honda CR-V 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 - 185 mm (6.7 - 7.3 inches) | 175 - 185 mm (6.9 - 7.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2010 is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2006 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`113 kg | ~ 2`098 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`684 kg | ~ 1`556 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 429 kg | ~ 542 kg | |
| Honda CR-V 2010 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Honda CR-V 2006. Therefore, Honda CR-V 2006 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |