Honda CR-V 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 166 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 350 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 9.5 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, the Honda CR-V 2010 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda CR-V 2007. On average, Honda CR-V 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2010 is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V 2007, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V 2010 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2007. This could mean that the Honda CR-V 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`097 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |