Honda CR-V 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 166 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
Torque: | 192 - 340 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 7.4 - 9.5 | |
On average, the Honda CR-V 2007 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda CR-V 2010. On average, Honda CR-V 2007 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2007 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V 2010, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 524 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | no data | |
Honda CR-V 2007 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V 2007 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2010. The Honda CR-V 2010 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 2`097 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
| |