Honda CR-V 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 166 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 340 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 9.5 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 - 185 mm (6.9 - 7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`098 kg | ~ 2`079 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`556 kg | ~ 1`553 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 542 kg | ~ 526 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |