Honda CR-V 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Nissan X-Trail
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.42.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 140 - 166 HP141 - 173 HP
Torque: 192 - 340 NM196 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 - 12.2 seconds9.8 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 9.57.1 - 9.6
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.63 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 556 litres479 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
955 litres1742 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 77 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 787 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`105~ 2`079
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 52004800
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Nissan X-Trail has
  • also available in 2WD
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv