Honda CR-V 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 162 HP | 158 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 340 NM | 186 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 12 seconds | 6 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Forester are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 9.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 13 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 387 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
952 litres | 1525 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 140 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 573 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`910 kg | ~ 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`492 kg | ~ 1`392 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 418 kg | ~ 608 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 45 procentiem less than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |