Honda CR-V 2002 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 162 HP | 94 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 220 NM | 138 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 12 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.1 | 7.3 - 9.8 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 65 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 828 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 269 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 124 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`910 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |