Honda CR-V 1997 vs Subaru Forester 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Honda CR-V
1997 - 2002
Subaru Forester
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.02.0

Performance

Power: 128 - 147 HP125 - 170 HP
Torque: 182 NM184 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 12.5 seconds8.4 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.7 - 10.29.0 - 10.5
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.45 m
Width: 1.75 m1.74 m
Height: 1.68 m1.59 m
Honda CR-V is larger.
Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 375 litres406 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
670 litres1525 litres
Subaru Forester has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 855 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester.
Gross weight: ~ 1`900 kg~ 1`905 kg
Net weight:~ 1`470 kg~ 1`443 kg
Load capacity:~ 430 kg~ 462 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 14001800
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • lower price
Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv