Honda CR-V 1997 vs Subaru Forester 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 - 147 HP | 125 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 184 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 8.4 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 10.2 | 9.0 - 10.5 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |