Honda CR-V 1997 vs Honda CR-V 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 - 147 HP | 150 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 190 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 10 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 10.2 | 9.1 - 10.1 | |
|
Honda CR-V 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 1997 is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V 2002, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V 1997 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V 1997 has 152 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V 2002 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V 1997 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |