Honda CR-V 1997 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 - 147 HP | 87 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 144 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 10.9 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 10.2 | 6.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 34 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 117 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`863 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |