Honda CR-V 1997 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 - 147 HP | 136 - 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 176 - 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 7.7 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 10.2 | 9.1 - 10.1 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 27 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 1035 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |