Honda Accord 2007 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is more dynamic to drive. Honda Accord engine produces 36 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda CR-V | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Accord might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Honda Accord is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 519 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Honda Accord has 52 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`885 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |