Honda Accord 2003 vs Lexus IS 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Lexus IS is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord and Lexus IS have the same engine power, but Honda Accord torque is 5 NM less than Lexus IS. Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.8 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus IS, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Lexus IS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 16 cm longer than the Lexus IS, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 475 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity. Honda Accord has 149 litres more trunk space than the Lexus IS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres more than that of the Lexus IS, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Lexus IS has
| |