Honda Accord 2003 vs Volvo S60 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 95 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Accord consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
| Honda Accord is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1034 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity. Honda Accord has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Honda Accord can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`920 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`537 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 473 kg | |
| Honda Accord load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Honda Accord is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Honda Accord has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |